The business of fashion

The business of fashion is full of examples of disruptors being disrupted. Just look at American retailers Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch, once trendsetters that came under enormous pressure from the rise of Zara, H&M and Uniqlo, European and Asian fast fashion players whose “cheap chic” formulas, offering stylish clothing at low prices, revolutionised the apparel market and drove the creation of huge multi-billion-dollar businesses.

Now, these fast fashion giants are facing mounting pressure themselves. To maintain growth, Zara has been relying on cutting prices, sending profitability at parent company Inditex, the world’s largest clothing firm, to an eight-year low. After years of expansion, profitability is also faltering at H&M, the world’s second-biggest fashion company, which reported weaker than expected first-quarter sales growth on Thursday. Uniqlo, too, is facing pressure. After posting revenue growth of more than 20 percent for three straight years, parent company Fast Retailing, the world’s third-largest apparel player, reported growth of only 6 percent following its move to raise prices due to climbing materials costs.

Indeed, the world’s top three fashion retailers — Inditex, H&M and Fast Retailing — have all suffered setbacks and are looking for ways to optimise their operations and tap future growth. Uniqlo is investing in supply chain optimisation to make it more responsive to consumer demand and plans to shorten the time it takes to move product from design to delivery to about 13 days, roughly the same as Zara, which is widely admired for its agility. “We need to be fast. We need to deliver products customers want quickly,” Tadashi Yanai, chairman, president and chief executive of Fast Retailing, told Bloomberg in March.

uniqlo business

uniqlo business

H&M is also investing in speed and flexibility. “To meet the rapid change that is going on in fashion retail we need to be even faster and more flexible in our work processes. We are therefore investing significantly in our supply chain, such as in new logistics solutions with greater levels of automation, but also in optimising our lead times,” said H&M chief executive Karl-Johan Persson alongside the company’s first-quarter results. The group is also expanding its portfolio, launching Arket, a new brand focused on “quality” and “style beyond trend.”

Торговый центр Crawford House с рекламной коллекцией Мадонны для H&M

Fast fashion is also looking for growth in emerging markets. Zara, for one, is expanding in Asia with a strategy that’s weighted towards e-commerce. This month, the brand launched online sales in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Later this year, it plans to debut e-commerce in India, where it currently has 21 stores. Meanwhile, H&M is set to open 430 new stores this financial year, including outposts in new markets like Kazakhstan, Colombia, Iceland, Vietnam and Georgia.

But all of this does not make up for the significant challenges Inditex, H&M and Fast Retailing are facing in critical consumer markets in Europe and the US, where they are now facing some of the same challenges as their American predecessors: too many stores and changing consumer patterns, especially amongst millennials who are moving online and shifting their spend away from clothes to technology and experiences. And a rising wave of increasingly popular and potentially disruptive competitors are perhaps the main threat: digitally-focused, direct-to-consumer fashion brands, from e-tailers like Missguided and Boohoo to the universe of labels being birthed on Instagram.

Whether or not these direct-to-consumer brands have the staying power to survive, scale and pose a real threat to the behemoths of fast fashion remains to be seen. While some may have short lifespans, others may blow up. Consider the case of Nasty Gal, which — before falling prey to mismanagement — quickly grew into a business generating sales of more than $100 million a year, largely on the back of its close, social media-driven relationship with its community of “badass” girls who identified with the company’s sexpot-hipster attitude.

Nasty Gal

Nasty Gal

Fast-expanding, Los Angeles-based brand Anine Bing also grew out of the eponymous founder’s closeness to her large social media following and is now sold at over 250 stockists as well as eight of its own retail stores. What distinguishes the retail disruptors of the future might just be the strength of the communities that they are able to build, making likes, shares and comments as important as traditional retail metrics like footfall.





Товарищ Patrick

Читайте также:

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *